Robin Agnew
For my February newsletter, already in progress, I have a planned focus on thrillers/page turners. The idea came to me as I was busy inhaling an ARC of Michael Palmer’s new book, The Last Surgeon. For me, Palmer is practically the ultimate page turning writer. I starting thinking after that what makes a thriller so "thrilling"? Why can’t you put it down? Why are some books just inert, using the same formula, and some are rocket powered?
All I could do, lacking the magical spark that I think all real writers must have, is figure out if there’s some kind of tried and true formula. There seem to be a few commonalities, traits shared by Coben, Connelly, Child, Cornwell, Fairstein, Deaver, Gerristsen, etc.
Upping the ante.
There are a couple ways an author seems to accomplish this one, but it’s important that the main character have some kind of mission which is tied to a deeply felt allegiance. Often this is a lost love (Coben) but it can also be a family member or a fallen friend (field of battle is a good one, see the latest Palmer title). Even the untouchable Jack Reacher might feel a bit of family feeling in The Enemy, which I think is my favorite of Lee Child’s books.
Twists.
The twists need to be spaced through the book, but there’s usually one at the end where a previously unsuspected character turns out to be bad. Harlan Coben is especially skilled at this one, so is Jeffery Deaver.
An unsolvable problem.
Obviously, the problem is solvable, but it has to seem insolvable. Dick Francis actually is a past master at this - in the last chapter he puts his hero into some situation where it seems like escape is pretty much impossible. Working from the old school, Francis doesn’t use any of the high tech stuff available to authors working today. One of my favorite Francis books winds up with him tying his main character to a simple coffee table.
Romance.
Not every suspense writer uses this one, but I always appreciate it. Michael Palmer is especially adept at getting two characters together, usually strong and interesting ones, and for me part of the fun of reading a Palmer book is figuring out which characters are going to get together. It doesn’t need to be a big part of the story, but it helps to up the ante (see above!)
Specificity.
This is the one, I think, that seperates the really good thrillers from the so-so ones. The specifics of something need to be an integral part of the story - it makes it more resonant, more engaging - just simply, better. Think of Connelly’s masterful Void Moon; Cornwell’s Postmortem, Jeffery Deaver’s The Stone Monkey, or practically any Dick Francis title. All spotlight something you probably didn’t know much about before, but you learn as you read! Steve Hamilton has a great one coming out, The Lock Artist, that will tell you all you need to know about picking locks.
PACE.
There’s no such thing as a poorly paced thriller. Again, I’m not sure what magic is involved here, but it’s definitely a skill. I read an interview with Barbara D’Amato once where she talked about physically laying out different parts of her manuscript on the floor and figuring out what worked. Since I think D’Amato is one of the best at pacing (and actual suspense) I was willing to take her word for it. Not being a writer myself, I don’t care how she does it as long as she produces a book for me to read! (And she and Jeanne Dams have a new collaboration due any minute).
And finally, Pace is the sister of Suspense.
In a really good thriller these two things need to fit seamlessly together. The loaded gun, to paraphrase Hitchcock, eventually has to go off. If the writer surprises you with the "when" then he/she has been successful.
And hopefully, I’ve given you some reading ideas, but if not, here are a few of my favorite thrillers:
Tess Gerritsen, Harvest (ante: missing HUMAN ORGANS).
Barbara D’Amato, Help Me Please (ante: kidnapped child).
Dick Francis, Flying Finish (specificity: planes AND horses).
Obvious, but true - Patricia Cornwell, Postmortem (specificity: forensics).
Again, obvious -Michael Connelly, The Poet (specificity: Edgar Allan Poe).
Jeffery Deaver, A Maiden’s Grave (ante: a bus FULL of deaf kids).
Jack Early, Donato & Daughter (Jack Early is also Sandra Scoppettone - this book is kick ass!)
Lynn Hightower, Satan’s Lambs (ante: sister of main character).
Some of these are hard to find, but well worth the hunt.
What a lovely post Christmas present this essay is. Thanks.
Posted by: Julie Kramer | December 26, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Nice one, Robin! And totally spot-on re. Francis, one of my all-time favourites!
Upping the ante one is interesting, especially with reference to Coben and the lost love, and also missing family members. There's been a clutch of writers recently trying to out-Coben Coben and in most cases I haven't been impressed -- they simply haven't made me care enough about the protagonist or the family.
Posted by: Lartonmedia | December 28, 2009 at 02:30 AM
Actually, don't you also think Dick Francis is great at "upping the ante"? I always feel emotionally invested in his characters and the outcome. He's one of the guys who got me "hooked" on mysteries in the first place.
Posted by: Robin Agnew | December 28, 2009 at 07:42 AM
Definitely! And Francis *always* makes you care about his characters.
Posted by: Lartonmedia | December 28, 2009 at 07:19 PM