I have always hated The Wizard of Oz. There. I said it.
When I was little, I didn't look forward to the annual showings (on NBC) of the 1939 "classic" the way my brother and our cousin from next door did. They thought it was an amazing event, something to be thought about and savored and experienced as close to the TV screen as possible.
Frankly, it scared the living crap out of me, and I dreaded it.
But as I got older, and the prospect of finding a green scary witch in a crystal ball when one was expecting a protective parental figure (that was the moment that got me most) was no longer as frightening as it had once been, I realized I still couldn't stand that movie. When I got married and had children, and the inevitable "need" for them to see the thing was pressured upon me by others, I got it over with as quickly as possible and never took the tape out again.
I consider it one of the most overrated films of all time, and I honestly and truly don't understand why it seems everyone else believes Oz to be a cherished film they could--and do--watch over and over again. If I never have to see it for the rest of my life, I'm totally fine with that.
From a storytelling standpoint, let's analyze:
1. We start out with a "little girl" who appears to be about 20. She's living on a farm in Kansas with her aunt and uncle (the parents we never even hear about), and we can tell it's drab because Kansas is in black and white. Oddly, actual people from Kansas don't see this as a slight to their home state and have embraced this movie. Go figure people from Kansas.
2. The girl is upset because some hag from down the road is going to take her dog away. This is accomplished with the consent of the aunt and uncle, who are such dishrags it's hard to understand why the girl is so attached to them. She goes out in the back and sings a rather tedious song about how she can't fly up into the sky and change her life. Since her life consists of hanging around in black and white, arguing with nasty women about dogs and singing tedious songs, it's easy to understand why.
3. Waddaya know, the girl gets her wish. Kansas is beset with a "twister," which you think means everyone has to put their left foot on red and their right hand on green (and that's going to be a problem, since Kansas is in black and white), but no, it's a tornado. The aunt and uncle flee to safety, but the girl isn't bright enough for that and endangers her dog and herself by staying in the house, which goes for a ride in the sky. Helen Hunt is nowhere to be seen, but the house lands somewhere the girl doesn't recognize. You'd think she'd sing some less tedious song about how happy she is now to be out of Kansas. No such luck. She's going to complain the whole movie.
4. Once she opens the door (to an "effect" that's as special as a guy changing the reel of film in the camera to color), she is beset upon by exposition. Characters pop out of every nook and cranny to explain what's going on and set out the plan for the rest of the story. You'd think there'd be a great song to go with this. Instead, they chant about a road made of yellow bricks until you want to throw yellow bricks at everybody to get them to shut up. Worst part: They never even tell you why they built a road out of yellow bricks to begin with. Overacting abounds. There are also unfortunate jokes about short people.
5. The girl, who has apparently committed negligent homicide, is told to go to the nearest city and seek out an authority figure who will fix all her problems. The idea that she solve her problems herself is never raised, nor is she given bus fare--she has to hoof it. She does meet three compadres along the way, each with a lugubrious scene in which the compadre of the moment sings an identical song complaining about something he doesn't have. Once again, the plan to go to the deus ex machina and ask for magical solutions is put in play, and nobody says, "Suck it up and work out a solution yourself." There are also unfortunate jokes about gay lions.
6. The midpoint is reached when the group of vagabonds arrives at the big city. You'd think the three guys would go off in search of tin, straw, and lionine women (or men), but they stick with the girl and get dolled up--three guys in a makeover scene while the girl looks exactly the same--to go see the authority figure who apparently runs the place. This is sort of like sending a girl and three oddballs to Chicago in the 1920s to see Al Capone, who would grant them clemency in the bootlegging wars.
7. Problem: Capone's not so quick handing out favors. You want something from him, you've got to show your loyalty first. And how does a mob boss define loyalty? He puts out a contract on an enemy, and orders the girl and her pals to do the hit. THEN they'll get what they want, he implies. So you think the girl and her posse in this children's film would tell Al to forget their requests; they'll work out their own solution that doesn't involve bloodshed. No chance--they set out to liquidate the Boss' competitor, another purveyor of magic.
8. This is accomplished with the oldest trick in the screenwriting book: The accidental murder. The girl gets mad enough to splash the witch--who looks suspicously like the old hag who wanted to put her dog to sleep--with a bucket of water, and waddaya know, she's allergic to water and melts into the floor, all the while complaining. This leads one to believe the witch is made of sugar, because my mother always told me that I could walk through the rain and it wouldn't kill me because I wasn't made out of sugar. You'd think the powerful sorceress would use her last moments to lash out with some magic aimed at her assassin, but no, she just whines and complains like everybody else in this movie. And you have to wonder why someone who can die from water would have a bucket of the stuff lying around within flinging distance in her own home. Does Superman keep a Kryptonite room in the Fortress of Solitude? I think not.
9. The girl, her dog, and the three odd men trudge back to their capo's hideout, and demand all the stuff he said they'd get after they whacked the old lady. Sure enough, he goes back on his word, is shown to be a fraud, and tries to buy them off with Seaside Heights boardwalk prizes he says are special because of the thought behind them--the very argument every kid is asked to swallow when given socks as a birthday gift. You expect them to fling all this garbage back in the guy's face, but no, they thank him for the wonderful gifts of self esteem.
10. The girl, who has been complaining the whole time about trying to get to black and white Kansas, is now told--by someone who could have said something 20 minutes into the picture and saved us a lot of grief--that she's been able to do that whenever she wanted by clicking her heels together and chanting that she wants to go home, clearly a pitch for some Hollywood religion of the time. Once again, a reasonable viewer might expect that the girl would pull off one of those shoes and beat the speaker senseless with the heels after all the tsuris she's been through, but she thanks her "benefactor" and follows the instructions.
11. The cheapest trick in the screenwriting book--the "it was just a dream" cop-out. This ENDS the movie. No song, no big twist, just "What you just saw all took place in the fever dream of a 20-year-old pretending to be a little girl." There is some hogwash about not looking for your dreams anywhere but in your own backyard, which is apparently meant to dissuade children from ever going out on their own and following their dreams. People should be throwing popcorn at the screen.
Instead, it's considered one of the great classics of Hollywood. People dress up in costumes. They go to actual theaters for singalong revival showings. They buy the props from the movie for exorbitant fees. Some of them find "alternate takes" on the story and make bad Diana Ross movies or blockbuster Broadway musicals.
Not me. I think it's a lousy movie, and I don't care who knows it. Demand more from your storytelling, people. You deserve it. Flying guys in monkey suits? Please.
Jeff,
I can't argue with your analysis.
I still love the film, and always will.
Maybe it's because of the family ritual that grew along with the annual showing.
Maybe it's because, in an early '70's theatrical re-release, I saw it in a theater. (The Wizard of Oz is best seen in public, with a large group of people willingly suspending their disbelief, in a theater that was standing at the time of the 1939 release. I've seen it live twice. Far preferable to any video version.)
Maybe it's just my personal tie to the story. (My dad was an avid reader. I came to learn as adult that he was also a bad reader. He read the entire book with me sitting on his lap. It must have been a Sisyphean task for him.)
Maybe it's because I overcame the desire to hide behind my chair when the flying monkeys appeared.
Maybe it's just because I liked Ray Bolger's dance sequence.
I don't really know.
The film is riddled with problems, I agree. The various remastering attempts over the years have often made the problems worse. Yeah, it's probably even a bad film.
But I love it. And always will.
Posted by: Jonathan Quist | December 05, 2011 at 08:47 AM
I've got your back on this one. My mother read me the story when I was 4 and then I saw the movie. Without giving anything away for any fortunate soul who hasn't seen this movie, I was appalled (yes, at age 4) that they changed the story from the book. That was the last time I saw the movie and my mother assures me that no one wanted me to see it again.
Posted by: Mare F | December 05, 2011 at 12:20 PM
What about the lollipop guild? You have to love that. That's the only reason I would want to go back to Kansas if I were Dorothy, to get away from those creeps.
I'm keeping my kids away from this classic. We're watching White Zombie instead.
William Doonan
www.williamdoonan.com
Posted by: William Doonan | December 05, 2011 at 12:31 PM
I'm so glad to find someone else who disliked this movie!
Posted by: Beverly Valcovic | December 05, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Amen to this, Jeff! I've detested this piece of garbage since I was a kid, though not because it scared me. It didn't. I never gave it the "in-depth analysis" you have; I just thought it obnoxious and moronic.
I helped raise the daughter of some friends, and she loved the movie. So if I've seen it once, I've suffered through it at least a dozen times (probably more) in adulthood.
I also despise another MGM epic that was released in 1939: "Gone With the Wind," one of the worst pieces of overacted melodramatic schlock ever foisted off on a gullible American public.
Posted by: Barry Ergang | December 05, 2011 at 01:30 PM
Anyone remember this film called Platoon? Now that was a piece of garbage! Long live the Wicked Witch!
Posted by: The Great W of the South! | December 05, 2011 at 04:07 PM
The flying monkeys kept me sitting on the stairs, down the hall, while my brothers watched the rest of the film. I've never liked the movie and I never will. So, like Mare, I've got your back on this one, too, Jeff.
Posted by: Lorraine Bartlett | December 05, 2011 at 04:25 PM
To be fair, I wasn't crazy about Platoon, either.
Posted by: Jeff Cohen | December 05, 2011 at 04:59 PM
In my 20s I was finally old enough to watch it without being terrified, and then I realized it was pretty corny. But until then I thought it a cinematic masterpiece, and I would sit through it in mounting terror all the way until the flying monkeys showed up, which was my cue to go hide in the kitchen until my siblings told me it was all right to come back. I loved that movie.
Now I wonder what I saw in it, and I don't often bother to watch it. Maybe it's just that I've lost my childhood fear of the unknown. I can watch the scenes that hint at the dream state she's in (everything in Munchkinland shrieks "it's a dream") without becoming emotionally involved at all.
Posted by: Adele | December 05, 2011 at 06:48 PM
Jeff, I am laughing but I still love the movie. AND you reminded me I have been meaning to watch the refurbished anniversary edition.
I had forgotten differences in the book and movie so I'll have to read it again too.
Posted by: BrendaW | December 05, 2011 at 06:50 PM
Jeff-
Once again, I have to thank you for putting a smile on my face at the end of a long day. while I don't hate the move, it's never been a favorite of mine either. I prefer most of the Disney movies. Although that man obviously hated mothers ans most of them never survived.
Posted by: gayle | December 05, 2011 at 06:59 PM
Have you read Maguire's Wicked? Its an excellent retelling. You would probably appreciate the way he picked up on many of the same unethical things you did. Trust me, its not a loving tribute to the movie.
Personally, I preferred the books as a kid but dutifully sat through the movie year after year. Most of the books were a bit moe ethical but they were all scary if you considered to a little kid, if you took them at all seriously. Oz is definitely a dystopia, but an interesting one.
Posted by: Shushan | December 05, 2011 at 11:57 PM
Why are people from Kansas not insulted? Growing up in Kansas, we know other people think it's gray and bland. No soaring mountains, no waves crashing against a rocky shore. We may leave, but there's always something about going home. Perhaps only a person from Kansas will appreciate a drive through the Flint Hills in the spring or all the colors of dry grasses growing beside the road in the autumn. By the way, I think the movie is sort of silly, too. Not as bad as "It's a Wonderful Life."
Posted by: FL Wylie | December 06, 2011 at 01:33 AM
When I was working on my English degree we had to write a paper on all the instances of team work in the movie. I absolutely hate the movie. I had to watch it about 15 times because whenever it got to the part of the bunch skipping through the poppy field I would fall asleep. Yes, there is good teamwork but it is the most idiotic movie of all time.
Posted by: Bev | December 06, 2011 at 06:17 PM